Best Known (258−65, 258, s)-Nets in Base 4
(258−65, 258, 558)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (193, 258, 558)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 42, 27)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (151, 216, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 72, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 72, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (10, 42, 27)-net over F4, using
(258−65, 258, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(193, 258, 648)-net in base 4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (190, 258, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (18, 86, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 91, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 78, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 78, 216)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 91, 216)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (18, 86, 216)-net in base 64, using
(258−65, 258, 2231)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (193, 258, 2231)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4258, 2231, F4, 65) (dual of [2231, 1973, 66]-code), using
- 1972 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (18, 7, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 17 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 19 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 22 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 24 times 0, 1, 24 times 0, 1, 25 times 0, 1, 25 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 27 times 0, 1, 27 times 0, 1, 28 times 0, 1, 29 times 0, 1, 29 times 0, 1, 30 times 0, 1, 30 times 0, 1, 32 times 0, 1, 32 times 0, 1, 33 times 0, 1, 33 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 35 times 0, 1, 36 times 0, 1, 37 times 0, 1, 38 times 0, 1, 38 times 0, 1, 40 times 0, 1, 40 times 0, 1, 41 times 0, 1, 42 times 0, 1, 43 times 0, 1, 44 times 0, 1, 46 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(465, 66, F4, 65) (dual of [66, 1, 66]-code or 66-arc in PG(64,4)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 66 [i]
- 1972 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (18, 7, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 17 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 19 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 22 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 24 times 0, 1, 24 times 0, 1, 25 times 0, 1, 25 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 27 times 0, 1, 27 times 0, 1, 28 times 0, 1, 29 times 0, 1, 29 times 0, 1, 30 times 0, 1, 30 times 0, 1, 32 times 0, 1, 32 times 0, 1, 33 times 0, 1, 33 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 35 times 0, 1, 36 times 0, 1, 37 times 0, 1, 38 times 0, 1, 38 times 0, 1, 40 times 0, 1, 40 times 0, 1, 41 times 0, 1, 42 times 0, 1, 43 times 0, 1, 44 times 0, 1, 46 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(465, 66, F4, 65) (dual of [66, 1, 66]-code or 66-arc in PG(64,4)), using
(258−65, 258, 291752)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (193, 258, 291753)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (193, 257, 291753)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 53634 632338 120185 884016 236354 106217 859452 660666 895180 326708 716541 693180 902888 758810 175341 653317 548276 553611 102456 246772 210410 704419 167022 194557 437870 243793 > 4257 [i]