Best Known (125, 125+79, s)-Nets in Base 4
(125, 125+79, 134)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (125, 204, 134)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 52, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 152, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (13, 52, 30)-net over F4, using
(125, 125+79, 331)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (125, 204, 331)-net over F4, using
(125, 125+79, 6952)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (125, 204, 6953)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (125, 203, 6953)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 166 149058 347182 743228 934566 525147 296482 996809 881670 932666 348099 006928 346734 259167 923963 098376 580011 735426 429922 957265 842888 > 4203 [i]