Best Known (126, 126+81, s)-Nets in Base 4
(126, 126+81, 134)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (126, 207, 134)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 53, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 154, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (13, 53, 30)-net over F4, using
(126, 126+81, 324)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (126, 207, 324)-net over F4, using
(126, 126+81, 6593)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (126, 207, 6594)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 206, 6594)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 10599 466050 709153 340682 990042 442641 315922 462965 336425 727489 662090 829725 362039 468039 658587 479112 632626 610726 384812 408654 405656 > 4206 [i]