Best Known (211−85, 211, s)-Nets in Base 4
(211−85, 211, 131)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (126, 211, 131)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (126, 212, 131)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 53, 27)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 159, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (10, 53, 27)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(211−85, 211, 299)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (126, 211, 299)-net over F4, using
(211−85, 211, 5601)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (126, 211, 5602)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 210, 5602)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2 713644 403594 899060 952791 833910 985956 225497 555205 698509 680470 108702 388131 707109 452112 621988 199843 140221 039532 001633 118333 949280 > 4210 [i]