Best Known (128, 128+89, s)-Nets in Base 4
(128, 128+89, 131)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (128, 217, 131)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (128, 218, 131)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 55, 27)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 163, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (10, 55, 27)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(128, 128+89, 290)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (128, 217, 290)-net over F4, using
(128, 128+89, 5156)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (128, 217, 5157)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (128, 216, 5157)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 11153 254759 348784 785348 906706 049974 143074 064760 718323 976667 995131 663492 590048 781061 685699 518335 833771 048993 324081 613851 581811 905664 > 4216 [i]