Best Known (226−93, 226, s)-Nets in Base 4
(226−93, 226, 134)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (133, 226, 134)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (133, 227, 134)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 60, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 167, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (13, 60, 30)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(226−93, 226, 297)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (133, 226, 297)-net over F4, using
(226−93, 226, 5246)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (133, 226, 5247)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (133, 225, 5247)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2924 536569 664156 941916 874632 205307 978877 020074 529402 641679 604552 062889 328193 982420 257776 179591 973803 690111 565429 305752 939605 610345 000307 > 4225 [i]