MinT - Best Known (104, 161, s)-Nets in Base 4

Best Known (104, 161, s)-Nets in Base 4

(104, 161, 151)-Net over F₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (104, 161, 151)-net over F₄, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (7, 35, 21)-net over F₄, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 20)-sequence over F₄, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
2. digital (69, 126, 130)-net over F₄, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 63, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
        the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(104, 161, 196)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive

(104, 161, 196)-net in base 4, using

4¹ times duplication [i] based on (103, 160, 196)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (23, 80, 98)-net in base 16, using
  - base change [i] based on digital (7, 64, 98)-net over F₃₂, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F₃₂, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(104, 161, 368)-Net over F₄ — Digital

Digital (104, 161, 368)-net over F₄, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(104, 161, 10357)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s

There is no (104, 161, 10358)-net in base 4, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 160, 10358)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4^mÂ â‰¥ 2 136652 090317 164334 699796 839782 911333 764671 793684 173174 052295 307176 872006 131214 111859 818562 558060 > 4¹⁶⁰ [i]