Best Known (136, 235, s)-Nets in Base 4
(136, 235, 134)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 235, 134)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (136, 236, 134)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 63, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 173, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (13, 63, 30)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(136, 235, 285)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (136, 235, 285)-net over F4, using
(136, 235, 4738)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 235, 4739)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (136, 234, 4739)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 764 289469 403791 107760 324775 640220 150871 162568 994347 896725 524218 010303 393377 204004 573527 462966 647917 000399 041882 880608 192863 784762 248299 007504 > 4234 [i]