Best Known (143, 256, s)-Nets in Base 4
(143, 256, 134)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 256, 134)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 257, 134)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 70, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 187, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (13, 70, 30)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(143, 256, 265)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (143, 256, 265)-net over F4, using
(143, 256, 3944)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 256, 3945)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (143, 255, 3945)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 3367 263892 530818 622914 056451 756433 568901 472438 269395 348807 120269 766448 821538 314378 622747 009242 743708 602743 312486 717759 935099 649559 029647 362736 050105 515444 > 4255 [i]