MinT - Best Known (92−10, 92, s)-Nets in Base 5

Best Known (92−10, 92, s)-Nets in Base 5

Digital (82, 92, 3355440)-net over F₅, using

trace code for nets [i] based on digital (36, 46, 1677720)-net over F₂₅, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25⁴⁶, 1677720, F₂₅, 10, 10) (dual of [(1677720, 10), 16777154, 11]-NRT-code), using
  - OA 5-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(25⁴⁶, 8388600, F₂₅, 10) (dual of [8388600, 8388554, 11]-code), using
    - discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25⁴⁶, large, F₂₅, 10) (dual of [large, large−46, 11]-code), using
      - the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 9765624Â = 25⁵âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [0,9], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 11 [i]

Digital (82, 92, large)-net over F₅, using

5² times duplication [i] based on digital (80, 90, large)-net over F₅, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (79, 90, large)-net over F₅, using
  - embedding of OOA with Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(5⁹⁰, large, F₅, 11) (dual of [large, large−90, 12]-code), using
    - 9 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(5⁸¹, large, F₅, 11) (dual of [large, large−81, 12]-code), using
      - the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 9765626Â | 5²⁰âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [0,5], and minimum distance dÂ â‰¥ |{−5,−4,…,5}|+1Â =Â 12 (BCH-bound) [i]

There is no (82, 92, large)-net in base 5, because