Best Known (65, 65+71, s)-Nets in Base 5
(65, 65+71, 82)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 136, 82)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (48, 136, 82)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 81)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 48 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 81)-sequence over F5, using
(65, 65+71, 120)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (65, 136, 120)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 136, 120)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 119)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 119)-sequence over F5, using
(65, 65+71, 1701)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 136, 1702)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 135, 1702)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 23361 509021 730706 539807 030046 453827 098937 759485 221367 227862 561969 323422 374465 837408 726581 217465 > 5135 [i]