Best Known (11, 11+79, s)-Nets in Base 64
(11, 11+79, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 90, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 90, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(11, 11+79, 225)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (11, 90, 225)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (10, 90, 225)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
(11, 11+79, 3215)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 90, 3216)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (11, 89, 3216)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 56612 532648 111814 288838 091826 780375 805995 153093 687712 373806 649660 316870 674565 114165 777264 893671 504464 688580 561027 516917 254877 970941 032167 791716 894630 654880 245180 > 6489 [i]