Best Known (16, 65, s)-Nets in Base 64
(16, 65, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 65, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 65, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(16, 65, 216)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(16, 65, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
(16, 65, 267)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (16, 65, 267)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 266)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 267, using
(16, 65, 10185)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 65, 10186)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 64, 10186)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 39 418779 853939 213772 621381 718927 418660 655675 820468 922201 437311 382444 130198 938963 284632 108134 076339 321096 250971 187356 > 6464 [i]