Best Known (64, 64+34, s)-Nets in Base 8
(64, 64+34, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 98, 354)-net over F8, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (64, 114, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 57, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 57, 177)-net over F64, using
(64, 64+34, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(64, 98, 518)-net in base 8, using
- 82 times duplication [i] based on (62, 96, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (38, 72, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 36, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 36, 259)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (38, 72, 518)-net over F16, using
(64, 64+34, 920)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (64, 98, 920)-net over F8, using
(64, 64+34, 164766)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 98, 164767)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 31831 669449 038937 104815 799176 783621 708373 449641 948942 925088 128249 183869 116242 045220 924910 > 898 [i]