Best Known (51, 51+38, s)-Nets in Base 8
(51, 51+38, 256)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 89, 256)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 92, 256)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 46, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 46, 128)-net over F64, using
(51, 51+38, 322)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (51, 89, 322)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 90, 322)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 45, 161)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 160)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 160)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 45, 161)-net over F64, using
(51, 51+38, 19236)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 89, 19237)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 237 355872 472246 671922 780980 432997 418284 651831 623282 951340 435820 046659 382675 900232 > 889 [i]