Best Known (166−69, 166, s)-Nets in Base 8
(166−69, 166, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (97, 166, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 166, 354)-net over F8, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(166−69, 166, 583)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (97, 166, 583)-net over F8, using
(166−69, 166, 46646)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (97, 166, 46647)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (97, 165, 46647)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 102313 571161 262187 224202 689299 410855 196125 843766 171503 450879 968467 883260 741501 254562 186128 206203 079243 493866 066559 434755 220661 122864 531475 031021 105441 > 8165 [i]