Best Known (82, 82+78, s)-Nets in Base 8
(82, 82+78, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (82, 160, 160)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (82, 162, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 81, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 81, 80)-net over F64, using
(82, 82+78, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(82, 160, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on (82, 168, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 126, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 126, 225)-net over F16, using
(82, 82+78, 286)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (82, 160, 286)-net over F8, using
(82, 82+78, 11126)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (82, 160, 11127)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 128384 697772 670853 031363 974327 331946 380963 481386 862237 093740 362853 459101 647896 046030 220373 737719 904206 476898 339244 954556 424238 266412 637662 234024 > 8160 [i]