Best Known (169−84, 169, s)-Nets in Base 8
(169−84, 169, 194)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (85, 169, 194)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 193)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 85 and N(F) ≥ 194, using
(169−84, 169, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(85, 169, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 169, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
(169−84, 169, 277)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (85, 169, 277)-net over F8, using
(169−84, 169, 10125)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (85, 169, 10126)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 419 244674 001640 858136 384909 838962 955145 886928 679096 798938 426534 307139 398142 800016 700937 712574 016069 012147 637151 173477 025130 981113 201280 450583 647732 707544 > 8169 [i]