Best Known (171−85, 171, s)-Nets in Base 8
(171−85, 171, 194)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 171, 194)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (85, 171, 194)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 193)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 85 and N(F) ≥ 194, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 193)-sequence over F8, using
(171−85, 171, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(86, 171, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 171, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
(171−85, 171, 280)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (86, 171, 280)-net over F8, using
(171−85, 171, 10641)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 171, 10642)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 170, 10642)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3363 151147 499530 867886 216925 292974 378268 360806 345871 998699 889764 472136 242393 364178 439435 835301 720666 835705 675439 858186 420272 331516 627237 932467 502675 448160 > 8170 [i]