Best Known (86, 165, s)-Nets in Base 8
(86, 165, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 165, 208)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (86, 166, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 83, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 83, 104)-net over F64, using
(86, 165, 225)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(86, 165, 225)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (83, 165, 225)-net in base 8, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 129, 225)-net over F16, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (83, 172, 225)-net in base 8, using
(86, 165, 316)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (86, 165, 316)-net over F8, using
(86, 165, 13777)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 165, 13778)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 164, 13778)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 12813 336697 683798 256595 938975 319044 637009 499586 531132 177553 005628 510620 926512 646054 777627 877522 736097 020449 439572 513559 176176 975652 200756 518689 497040 > 8164 [i]