Best Known (96, 165, s)-Nets in Base 8
(96, 165, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 165, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 165, 354)-net over F8, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(96, 165, 564)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (96, 165, 564)-net over F8, using
(96, 165, 43878)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 165, 43879)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 164, 43879)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 12796 214191 649922 698001 588396 690702 304335 075543 211319 541992 870978 019568 150453 415157 200308 621764 696965 367407 315349 582236 343135 154390 073338 515569 699617 > 8164 [i]