Best Known (95, 166, s)-Nets in Base 8
(95, 166, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 166, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 166, 354)-net over F8, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(95, 166, 514)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (95, 166, 514)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (12, 83, 257)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
(95, 166, 35918)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 166, 35919)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (95, 165, 35919)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 102294 547642 004660 272774 560126 573638 879268 651297 648028 642666 782132 421931 176700 043940 842813 551060 331196 405207 098142 246381 740876 598294 613201 925987 986760 > 8165 [i]