Best Known (16, 16+13, s)-Nets in Base 9
(16, 16+13, 200)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 29, 200)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (16, 30, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 100)-net over F81, using
(16, 16+13, 10620)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 29, 10621)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 28, 10621)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 523 596858 902988 687561 104049 > 928 [i]