Best Known (125−36, 125, s)-Nets in Base 9
(125−36, 125, 768)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 125, 768)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 21, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (68, 104, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 52, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 52, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (3, 21, 28)-net over F9, using
(125−36, 125, 4466)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (89, 125, 4466)-net over F9, using
(125−36, 125, 3996897)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 125, 3996898)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 190684 304099 695209 967858 232644 536736 365499 074148 072616 261656 144216 913671 041132 210780 057130 481131 800613 816389 860772 814305 > 9125 [i]