Best Known (99, 99+43, s)-Nets in Base 9
(99, 99+43, 768)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (99, 142, 768)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 24, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (75, 118, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 59, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 59, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (3, 24, 28)-net over F9, using
(99, 99+43, 3496)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (99, 142, 3496)-net over F9, using
(99, 99+43, 2769857)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (99, 142, 2769858)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (99, 141, 2769858)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 353 341778 187548 287862 537851 932223 137687 605624 770730 921015 453930 420343 951143 446444 731907 654393 588413 569916 837797 560947 196356 583100 916945 > 9141 [i]