Best Known (38, 38+45, s)-Nets in Base 9
(38, 38+45, 92)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 83, 92)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 25, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 58, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (3, 25, 28)-net over F9, using
(38, 38+45, 94)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(38, 83, 94)-net in base 9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (38, 84, 94)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 56, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 94, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 56, 94)-net over F27, using
(38, 38+45, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (38, 83, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 83, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(38, 38+45, 4065)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 83, 4066)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 82, 4066)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 778074 856319 513908 803633 342759 846312 027385 850211 559608 408597 267462 933841 026209 > 982 [i]