Best Known (52, 52+45, s)-Nets in Base 9
(52, 52+45, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 97, 232)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (52, 100, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 50, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 50, 116)-net over F81, using
(52, 52+45, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (52, 97, 272)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (52, 98, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 49, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 49, 136)-net over F81, using
(52, 52+45, 16496)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 97, 16497)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (52, 96, 16497)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 40 531396 338381 228770 934104 633606 749709 513972 036748 172365 218676 366613 920280 035903 435977 983345 > 996 [i]