Best Known (52, 52+46, s)-Nets in Base 9
(52, 52+46, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 98, 232)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (52, 100, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 50, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 50, 116)-net over F81, using
(52, 52+46, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (52, 98, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 49, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
(52, 52+46, 13703)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 98, 13704)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3282 234181 966894 509017 556600 650165 866193 285229 176074 029425 115563 388210 076426 103673 328072 523457 > 998 [i]