Best Known (114−48, 114, s)-Nets in Base 9
(114−48, 114, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 114, 344)-net over F9, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (66, 118, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 59, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 59, 172)-net over F81, using
(114−48, 114, 488)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (66, 114, 488)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 57, 244)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 243)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 244, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 243)-sequence over F81, using
(114−48, 114, 41761)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 114, 41762)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6 078870 604334 289218 862450 316162 216167 937885 847842 681883 184808 765275 212312 841685 010841 538163 018762 049498 716289 > 9114 [i]