Best Known (40, 40+49, s)-Nets in Base 9
(40, 40+49, 92)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 89, 92)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 27, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 62, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (3, 27, 28)-net over F9, using
(40, 40+49, 94)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(40, 89, 94)-net in base 9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (40, 90, 94)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 60, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 94, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 60, 94)-net over F27, using
(40, 40+49, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (40, 89, 140)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 89, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
(40, 40+49, 3850)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 89, 3851)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 88, 3851)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 942641 503213 965804 956225 834541 767594 070181 023012 242894 366034 474102 154252 998285 922881 > 988 [i]