Best Known (105−53, 105, s)-Nets in Base 9
(105−53, 105, 128)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 105, 128)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 39, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 66, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9 (see above)
- digital (13, 39, 64)-net over F9, using
(105−53, 105, 198)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (52, 105, 198)-net over F9, using
(105−53, 105, 8637)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 105, 8638)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (52, 104, 8638)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1745 912486 871169 231238 915633 109760 392783 780082 087825 673563 999974 152263 460972 966842 432859 417742 832545 > 9104 [i]