Best Known (48, 48+57, s)-Nets in Base 9
(48, 48+57, 102)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 105, 102)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 31, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 74, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (3, 31, 28)-net over F9, using
(48, 48+57, 163)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 105, 163)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 162)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 48 and N(F) ≥ 163, using
(48, 48+57, 4928)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 105, 4929)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 104, 4929)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1743 618092 316960 634086 121519 956373 796185 454753 878980 186259 120903 163911 476492 690738 177710 203768 090465 > 9104 [i]