Best Known (110−63, 110, s)-Nets in Base 9
(110−63, 110, 92)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 110, 92)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 34, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 76, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (3, 34, 28)-net over F9, using
(110−63, 110, 94)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(47, 110, 94)-net in base 9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (47, 111, 94)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 74, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 94, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 74, 94)-net over F27, using
(110−63, 110, 162)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (47, 110, 162)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (46, 110, 162)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 46 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
(110−63, 110, 3498)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 110, 3499)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (47, 109, 3499)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 103 596702 192120 192199 901916 471670 596443 908790 429978 064710 328549 225796 464536 335047 991392 446147 555786 102313 > 9109 [i]