Best Known (100−69, 100, s)-Nets in Base 9
(100−69, 100, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 100, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 100, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(100−69, 100, 120)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (31, 100, 120)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 119)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
(100−69, 100, 995)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 100, 996)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 99, 996)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 30086 874252 546190 890996 225125 186684 275701 011636 888126 834684 817846 681086 432865 114488 422735 689921 > 999 [i]