Best Known (144−83, 144, s)-Nets in Base 9
(144−83, 144, 102)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 144, 102)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 44, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 100, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (3, 44, 28)-net over F9, using
(144−83, 144, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (61, 144, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
(144−83, 144, 4270)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 144, 4271)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (61, 143, 4271)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 28723 373852 956032 768237 379000 351271 167514 628391 914132 012585 530789 236590 730672 810969 385687 239671 698563 605426 264843 840266 059746 301747 636281 > 9143 [i]