Best Known (20, 104, s)-Nets in Base 9
(20, 104, 74)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 104, 74)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (17, 104, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
(20, 104, 84)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (20, 104, 84)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 104, 84)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 83)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 83)-sequence over F9, using
(20, 104, 450)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 104, 451)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1798 887964 893426 167909 424885 705208 883978 104069 342560 740130 633989 316145 040445 283739 001734 671269 954417 > 9104 [i]