Best Known (22, 129, s)-Nets in Base 9
(22, 129, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 129, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
(22, 129, 88)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (22, 129, 88)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 129, 88)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 87)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 88, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 87)-sequence over F9, using
(22, 129, 487)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 129, 488)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (22, 128, 488)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 152 360735 685384 270296 480154 970674 728333 698119 835260 287723 972504 244988 280840 551058 664724 660719 128114 606251 336082 297429 332545 > 9128 [i]