Best Known (46, 132, s)-Nets in Base 9
(46, 132, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 132, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 132, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(46, 132, 162)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 132, 162)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 46 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(46, 132, 1767)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 132, 1768)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 930710 254749 532953 767466 327414 578799 115561 707037 106990 357939 797310 013484 671672 891899 310470 169682 074189 291457 740873 879238 933185 > 9132 [i]