Best Known (96, 137, s)-Nets in Base 9
(96, 137, 768)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 137, 768)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 23, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (73, 114, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 57, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 57, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (3, 23, 28)-net over F9, using
(96, 137, 3676)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (96, 137, 3676)-net over F9, using
(96, 137, 3199364)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 137, 3199365)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 136, 3199365)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 5983 888472 277441 769204 597853 564845 306094 016878 965690 185421 596154 183308 571530 163312 741674 260169 561110 431386 828923 489433 033683 383201 > 9136 [i]