Best Known (64, 138, s)-Nets in Base 9
(64, 138, 165)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 138, 165)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- T4 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
(64, 138, 193)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (64, 138, 193)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(9138, 193, F9, 3, 74) (dual of [(193, 3), 441, 75]-NRT-code), using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(9135, 192, F9, 3, 74) (dual of [(192, 3), 441, 75]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,501P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(9135, 192, F9, 3, 74) (dual of [(192, 3), 441, 75]-NRT-code), using
(64, 138, 6613)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 138, 6614)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 487065 162413 100250 667095 275096 458354 830588 747488 645745 591627 745456 754611 798263 415900 013173 412243 163679 123403 941004 611388 149391 662065 > 9138 [i]