Best Known (23, 149, s)-Nets in Base 9
(23, 149, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 149, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 149, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(23, 149, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 149, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
(23, 149, 508)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 149, 509)-net in base 9, because
- 6 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 143, 509)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 29024 298757 528591 171990 129589 678557 862956 169729 219612 110071 289217 782589 435770 931825 724423 194322 120219 156920 879620 614091 827106 074129 404385 > 9143 [i]