Best Known (29, 52, s)-Nets in Base 9
(29, 52, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 52, 232)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (29, 54, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 27, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 27, 116)-net over F81, using
(29, 52, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (29, 52, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 26, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
(29, 52, 16291)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 52, 16292)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 51, 16292)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 638966 924859 127211 870356 967463 083270 736682 753505 > 951 [i]