Best Known (34, 91, s)-Nets in Base 9
(34, 91, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 91, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 91, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(34, 91, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (34, 91, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 91, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(34, 91, 1631)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 91, 1632)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 90, 1632)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 76 590532 372053 031796 531033 003516 284783 516275 349224 793043 718702 129875 456790 585055 333377 > 990 [i]