Best Known (45, 96, s)-Nets in Base 9
(45, 96, 102)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 96, 102)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 28, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 68, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (3, 28, 28)-net over F9, using
(45, 96, 148)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (45, 96, 148)-net over F9, using
(45, 96, 5363)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 96, 5364)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (45, 95, 5364)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 512002 700920 127640 230463 885324 034640 211884 800089 625733 229988 061063 478064 089871 056319 902881 > 995 [i]