Best Known (46, 98, s)-Nets in Base 9
(46, 98, 102)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 98, 102)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 29, 28)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 27)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 69, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (3, 29, 28)-net over F9, using
(46, 98, 162)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 98, 162)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 46 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(46, 98, 5195)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 98, 5196)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3282 939897 733811 989108 804489 981491 991418 255037 506221 888859 496131 519567 684890 831330 373959 632705 > 998 [i]