Best Known (32, 32+57, s)-Nets in Base 2
(32, 32+57, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 89, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 89, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(32, 32+57, 27)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (32, 89, 27)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (31, 89, 27)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 26)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 26)-sequence over F2, using
(32, 32+57, 64)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 89, 65)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 88, 65)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 330 885312 553330 496313 188304 > 288 [i]