Best Known (94−64, 94, s)-Nets in Base 2
(94−64, 94, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 94, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 94, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(94−64, 94, 25)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (30, 94, 25)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 94, 25)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
(94−64, 94, 47)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 94, 48)-net in base 2, because
- 4 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 90, 48)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(290, 48, S2, 2, 60), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 79228 162514 264337 593543 950336 / 61 > 290 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(290, 48, S2, 2, 60), but