Best Known (229−69, 229, s)-Nets in Base 2
(229−69, 229, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 229, 112)-net over F2, using
- 25 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (160, 254, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
(229−69, 229, 198)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (160, 229, 198)-net over F2, using
(229−69, 229, 1363)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 229, 1364)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (160, 228, 1364)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 438 403331 070517 236618 007099 624346 557304 644874 476501 080048 150153 893598 > 2228 [i]