Best Known (179−75, 179, s)-Nets in Base 2
(179−75, 179, 60)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 179, 60)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (104, 182, 60)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 91, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 91, 30)-net over F4, using
(179−75, 179, 76)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (104, 179, 76)-net over F2, using
(179−75, 179, 359)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 179, 360)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 178, 360)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 404944 552818 026750 305302 453909 388596 033412 310315 359053 > 2178 [i]