Best Known (210−92, 210, s)-Nets in Base 2
(210−92, 210, 60)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (118, 210, 60)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 105, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
(210−92, 210, 78)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (118, 210, 78)-net over F2, using
(210−92, 210, 297)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (118, 210, 298)-net in base 2, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2210, 298, S2, 92), but
- 2 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield OA(2212, 300, S2, 92), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2484 132694 351399 471861 447697 940992 402712 231248 004226 234322 576635 442083 069406 167011 327832 607273 517056 / 377277 818302 855799 777736 052112 623275 > 2212 [i]
- 2 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield OA(2212, 300, S2, 92), but